© 1996, Topology Atlas
Ever since the Cech-Stone compactification betaX was discovered, topologists have been trying to `see' what it looks like, especially for fundamental spaces like N (the discrete space of natural numbers) and R (the real line). Of particular interest is of course the set of new points, that is the remainder X*=betaX minus X.
The remainder of N is now fairly well understood --- although several natural questions remain open, see [5]. Indeed, the known results on betaN and its remainder could fill several volumes. One of the reasons for this success is that the space N has no real structure so that in translating statements from the remainder to N one ends up with statements that are simply about sets and do not refer to any topological property. Therefore all the machinery of set theory can then be brought to bear on the problem at hand.
The remainder of R is the topological sum of the remainders of H=[0,infinity) and (-infinity,0] respectively. These remainders are homeomorphic, so we usually only deal with H and its remainder. The `problem' with H and its remainder is that both spaces are continua; this gives us much less room to maneuver. This does not mean that it is impossible to say something about our spaces. It has been established that the remainder of H is an indecomposable and hereditarily unicoherent continuum, but not hereditarily indecomposable. The basic structure of this remainder has also been determined. A reasonably up-to-date survey is [4]; some more recent results are in [1], [2] and [3].
To answer the question in the title: the real line is, as is the set of natural numbers, a fundamental object in mathematics. It is therefore of utmost importance to learn as much as we can about objects that are naturally associated with it.
We conclude with two (very) open problems about the remainder of H: