| Topology Atlas Document # taic-40 | Topology Atlas Invited Contributions vol. 5 issue 1 (2000) 29-33 |
School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences,
Faculty of Science, University of Natal,
King George V Avenue,
Durban 4041, South Africa
gutev@sci.und.ac.za
Let X be a T1-space, F(X) be the set of all non-empty closed subsets of X, and let t be an admissible topology on F(X) in the sense that the restriction of t on {{x} : x in X} coincides with the topology of X.
Let D be a subset of F(X). A map f:D --> X is a selection for D if f(S) is in S for every S in D. A map f:D --> X is a t-continuous selection for D if it is a selection for D which is continuous with respect to the relative topology on D as a subspace of (F(X),t).
So far, one of the best known admissible topologies on F(X) is the Vietoris one tV. Let us recall that tV is generated by all collections of the form
<V> = { S in F(X) : S is a subset of the union of V and S meets V in a non-empty intersection for each V in V },where V runs over the finite families of open subsets of X.
In what follows, all spaces are assumed to be at least Hausdorff. For a space X, let F2(X) = {S in F(X): |S| <= 2}. Also, let Sel(X) be the set of all tV-continuous selections for F(X), and Sel2(X) that of all tV-continuous selections for F2(X).
Any selection f in Sel2(X) naturally defines an order-like relation <f on X [9] by letting for x no equal to y that x <f y iff f({x,y}) = x. Unfortunately, in general, <f fails to be a linear order on X. Let us denote by Tf the topology generated by all possible ``open'' <f-intervals.
Theorem 1 [9] If (X,T) is a topological space and f in Sel2(X), then Tf is a subset T. If, in addition, (X,T) is connected, then <f is a proper linear order on X.
Theorem 2 [11] If X is a compact space with Sel2(X) non-empty, then it is a linear ordered topological space. In particular, ind(X) <= 1.
Here, ind(X) means the small inductive dimension of X.
In view of Theorem 2.1, it makes some sense to investigate the topology Tf. In particular, Theorems 2.1 and 2.2 might be associated by the following natural question.
Question 1. Let (X,T) be a locally compact space with Sel2(X) non-empty. Does there exist a topology T* subset T on X such that(X,T*) is a linear ordered topological space?
Here is a related question.
Question 2. Does there exist a space X such that Sel2(X) non-empty and ind(X) > 1?
Theorem 1 For a space X, with Sel(X) non-empty, the following holds:
For some other relations between |Sel(X)| and X, the interested reader is referred to [5, 12, 13].
Theorem 1 [8] Let X be a space with Sel(X) non-empty. Then, {f(X) : f in Sel(X)} is dense in X provided X is zero-dimensional, while X is totally disconnected provided {f(X) : f in Sel(X)} is dense in X.
As usual, a space X is zero-dimensional if it has a base of clopen sets, i.e. if ind(X) = 0.
Question 3. Does there exist a space X which is not zero-dimensional but {f(X) : f in Sel(X)} is dense in X?
Question 4. Let X be a totally disconnected space with Sel(X) non-empty. Is the set {f(X) : f in Sel(X)} dense in X?
Some related results are summarized below.
Theorem 2 For a space X, with Sel(X) non-empty, the following holds:
Here, dim(X) means the covering dimension of X.
Most of the hypotheses in Theorem 5.1 are the best possible. The assumption dim(X) = 0 cannot be dropped or even weakened to dim(X) <= 1 [4, 11]; a metrizable space X is completely metrizable provided there exists a tV-continuous selection for F(X) [10]; the continuity of f can be improved in several directions involving hyperspace topologies weaker than the Vietoris one [1, 3, 6, 7]. For some open questions on the continuity of f, the interested reader is referred to [3, 7].
Concerning the hypothesis "dim(X) = 0", the following question seems to be interesting.
Question 5. Does there exist a zero-dimensional metrizable space X such that F(X) has a tV-continuous selection but dim(X) is not equal to 0?
Date published: September 15, 2000.