Topology Atlas Document # taic-40 Topology Atlas Invited Contributions vol. 5 issue 1 (2000) 29-33

Selections for hyperspace topologies

Valentin Gutev

School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences,
Faculty of Science, University of Natal,
King George V Avenue,
Durban 4041, South Africa
gutev@sci.und.ac.za

AtlasImage version
DVI file

1 The concept of a t-continuous selection

Let X be a T1-space, F(X) be the set of all non-empty closed subsets of X, and let t be an admissible topology on F(X) in the sense that the restriction of t on {{x} : x in X} coincides with the topology of X.

Let D be a subset of F(X). A map f:D --> X is a selection for D if f(S) is in S for every S in D. A map f:D --> X is a t-continuous selection for D if it is a selection for D which is continuous with respect to the relative topology on D as a subspace of (F(X),t).

So far, one of the best known admissible topologies on F(X) is the Vietoris one tV. Let us recall that tV is generated by all collections of the form

<V> = { S in F(X) : S is a subset of the union of V and S meets V in a non-empty intersection for each V in V },
where V runs over the finite families of open subsets of X.

2 Selections and orderability

In what follows, all spaces are assumed to be at least Hausdorff. For a space X, let F2(X) = {S in F(X): |S| <= 2}. Also, let Sel(X) be the set of all tV-continuous selections for F(X), and Sel2(X) that of all tV-continuous selections for F2(X).

Any selection f in Sel2(X) naturally defines an order-like relation <f on X [9] by letting for x no equal to y that x <f y iff f({x,y}) = x. Unfortunately, in general, <f fails to be a linear order on X. Let us denote by Tf the topology generated by all possible ``open'' <f-intervals.

Theorem 1 [9] If (X,T) is a topological space and f in Sel2(X), then Tf is a subset T. If, in addition, (X,T) is connected, then <f is a proper linear order on X.

Theorem 2 [11] If X is a compact space with Sel2(X) non-empty, then it is a linear ordered topological space. In particular, ind(X) <= 1.

Here, ind(X) means the small inductive dimension of X.

In view of Theorem 2.1, it makes some sense to investigate the topology Tf. In particular, Theorems 2.1 and 2.2 might be associated by the following natural question.

Question 1. Let (X,T) be a locally compact space with Sel2(X) non-empty. Does there exist a topology T* subset T on X such that(X,T*) is a linear ordered topological space?

Here is a related question.

Question 2. Does there exist a space X such that Sel2(X) non-empty and ind(X) > 1?

3 On the cardinality of Sel(X)

The cardinality of Sel(X) gives an information for X, mainly when it is finite.

Theorem 1 For a space X, with Sel(X) non-empty, the following holds:

  1. If X is connected, then |Sel(X)| <= 2, [9].
  2. Sel(X) is finite iff X has finitely many connected components, [13].
  3. If X is infinite and connected, then |Sel(X)| = 2 iff X is compact, [12].

For some other relations between |Sel(X)| and X, the interested reader is referred to [5, 12, 13].

4 On the variety of Sel(X)

Definitely, Sel(X) represents a bigger variety provided X has some disconnectedness-like properties. In fact, all known selection constructions are based on "the choice of the extreme element". This naturally restricts our knowledge about particular members of Sel(X).

Theorem 1 [8] Let X be a space with Sel(X) non-empty. Then, {f(X) : f in Sel(X)} is dense in X provided X is zero-dimensional, while X is totally disconnected provided {f(X) : f in Sel(X)} is dense in X.

As usual, a space X is zero-dimensional if it has a base of clopen sets, i.e. if ind(X) = 0.

Question 3. Does there exist a space X which is not zero-dimensional but {f(X) : f in Sel(X)} is dense in X?

Question 4. Let X be a totally disconnected space with Sel(X) non-empty. Is the set {f(X) : f in Sel(X)} dense in X?

Some related results are summarized below.

Theorem 2 For a space X, with Sel(X) non-empty, the following holds:

  1. X is zero-dimensional provided for every x in X there exists fx in Sel(X) with fx-1(x) = {S in F(X) : x in S}, [8].
  2. If X is first countable and zero-dimensional, then for every x in X there exists fx in Sel(X) with fx-1(x) = {S in F(X) : x in S}, [8].
  3. If X is separable, then it is zero-dimensional and first countable iff for every x in X there exists fx in Sel(X) with fx-1(x) = {S in F(X) : x in S}, [5].

5 Selections in metrizable spaces

Theorem 1 [2, 4] Let X be a completely metrizable space with dim(X) = 0. Then, there exists a tV-continuous selection f for F(X).

Here, dim(X) means the covering dimension of X.

Most of the hypotheses in Theorem 5.1 are the best possible. The assumption dim(X) = 0 cannot be dropped or even weakened to dim(X) <= 1 [4, 11]; a metrizable space X is completely metrizable provided there exists a tV-continuous selection for F(X) [10]; the continuity of f can be improved in several directions involving hyperspace topologies weaker than the Vietoris one [1, 3, 6, 7]. For some open questions on the continuity of f, the interested reader is referred to [3, 7].

Concerning the hypothesis "dim(X) = 0", the following question seems to be interesting.

Question 5. Does there exist a zero-dimensional metrizable space X such that F(X) has a tV-continuous selection but dim(X) is not equal to 0?

References

[1]
D. Bertacchi and C. Costantini, Existence of selections and disconnectedness properties for the hyperspace of an ultrametric space, Topology Appl. 88 (1998), 179-197.

[2]
M. Choban, Many-valued mappings and Borel sets. I, Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. 22 (1970), 258-280.

[3]
C. Costantini and V. Gutev, Recognizing special metrics by topological properties of the ``metric''-proximal hyperspace, preprint, 1997.

[4]
R. Engelking, R. W. Heath, and E. Michael, Topological well-ordering and continuous selections, Invent. Math. 6 (1968), 150-158.

[5]
S. García-Ferreira, V. Gutev, T. Nogura, M. Sanchis, and A. Tomita, Extreme selections for hyperspaces of topological spaces, Topology Appl. (2000), to appear.

[6]
V. Gutev, Selections and hyperspace topologies via special metrics, Topology Appl. 70 (1996), 147-153.

[7]
V. Gutev and T. Nogura, Selections for Vietoris-like hyperspace topologies, Proc. London Math. Soc. 80 (2000), no. 3, 235-256.

[8]
----, Vietoris continuous selections and disconnectedness-like properties, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. (2000), to appear.

[9]
E. Michael, Topologies on spaces of subsets, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 71 (1951), 152-182.

[10]
J. van Mill, J. Pelant, and R. Pol, Selections that characterize topological completeness, Fund. Math. 149 (1996), 127-141.

[11]
J. van Mill and E. Wattel, Selections and orderability, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 83 (1981), no. 3, 601-605.

[12]
T. Nogura and D. Shakhmatov, Characterizations of intervals via continuous selections, Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo, Serie II, 46 (1997), 317-328.

[13]
----, Spaces which have finitely many continuous selections, Bollettino dell'Unione Matematica Italiana 11-A (1997), no. 7, 723-729.

Date published: September 15, 2000.


Copyright 2000 © Topology Atlas.