Topology Atlas Document # taic-19.htm
| Production Editor: R. Flagg
Topology Atlas Invited Contributions, vol. 2, issue 1 (1996), 1-2.
© 1996, Topology Atlas
On topologizing infinite algebraic systems
by
Vladimir I. Arnautov(Indtitul de matematica, Kishinev, Moldova)
One of the important questions of topological algebra is a question
about how algebraic operations in this system influence the existence of
distinct topologies, in particular, the question about a possibility
of defining non-discrete topologies in the infinite algebraic systems?
The beginning of this problem for countable groups research was set
by A.A.Marcov in 1946. Further, this question was studied by many
authors for different algebraic systems:
- For groups and their generalizations (Kertesz A., Szele T.,
Ol'shansky A., Hanson J., Suvorov N., Taimanov A., and others);
- For rings and fields (Arnaautov V., Hochster M., Kiltintn J.,
Mutylin A. and others). Proof of the main rezults on this question can
be foud, for example, in the monograph of V.I.Arnautov, S.T.Glavatsky,
A.V.Mikhalev "Introduction to the theory of topological Ring and
Modules", Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York,Basil, Hong Kong 1996;
- Besides, great number of works are devoted to the questin
aboud the number of different topologies on the algebraic system
given.
State of the art at present:
- Each abelian group admits a non-discrete group topology;
- It was created an example of countable group, which does
not admit non-discrete group topologies;
- Each countable (not necessarily associative ) ring admits a
non-discrete ring topology;
- Each infinite associative-commutative ring admits non-discrete
ring topology;
- It was created an example of non-associative infinite ring,
which does not admit a non-discrete ring topologies;
- Each ifinite field admits non-discrete topology in which it
is a topological field.
Problems:
- Does any infinite assotiative ring admit a non-discrete ring
topology?
- Does any infinite (countable) skew field admit non-discrete
topology in which it is a topological skew field?
Received by the editors: February 1, 1996.