Atlas Mathematical Conference Abstracts || Conferences | Abstracts | for Organizers | About AMCA

Twenty First Victorian Algebra Conference with Workshop on Universal Algebraic Techniques in Semigroup Theory and Algebraic Logic
September 29 - October 1, 2003
La Trobe University
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Organizers
Marcel Jackson, Brian Davey

View Abstracts
Conference Homepage

Axiomatisability for topological quasivarieties: groups and semigroups
by
Marcel Jackson
La Trobe University

The quasivariety Q(A) generated by a finite algebra A is the class of all algebras that are sub-algebras of non-empty powers of A. The universal Horn theory ThuH(A) of A is the set of formulas of the form
(p1 = q1 & p2 = q2 & ... & pn-1 = qn-1) --> pn = qn
or
~ (p1 = q1) \/ ~ (p2 = q2) \/ ... \/ ~ (pn = qn)
(for some n and some terms pi, qi) that are satisfied by A. The cancellative law for semigroups xy = zy --> x = z is an example of a formula of the first kind.

The topological quasivariety QT(A) of a finite algebra A is the class of algebras homeomorphic to a closed subalgebra of a power of A, where A, as a finite algebra, is given the discrete topology. Topologically, all such algebras have Boolean topology; that is, they must be compact, Hausdorff and have a basis of clopen sets.

A classical result of Mal'Cev states that Q(A) is exactly the class of all algebras satisfying the formulas in ThuH(A). However, it is a strange fact that Mal'cev's theorem no longer holds for topological quasivarieties: while all members of QT(A) satisfy ThuH(A), it is sometimes possible to find a Boolean topological algebra satisfying ThuH(A) but not lying in QT(A). In this case we say that A is non-standard. We say that A is inherently non-standard if whenever A is in the quasivariety of some finite algebra B, then B is non-standard.

In this talk we give the first examples of inherently non-standard algebras and give a description of all such algebras in the class of finite groups and more generally, finite completely simple semigroups. For these examples, the property turns out to be related to several other well known properties such as residual character and finite axiomatisability.

Date received: August 4, 2003


Copyright © 2003 by the author(s). The author(s) of this document and the organizers of the conference have granted their consent to include this abstract in Atlas Mathematical Conference Abstracts. Document # cala-05.