Atlas Mathematical Conference Abstracts || Conferences | Abstracts | for Organizers | About AMCA

17th "Summer" Conference on Topology and Applications
July 1-4, 2002
University of Auckland
Auckland, New Zealand

Organizers
David Gauld (University of Auckland), Sina Greenwood (University of Auckland), David McIntyre (University of Auckland), Warren Moors (Waikato University), Sidney Morris (University of South Australia), Vladimir Pestov (Victoria University Wellington), Ivan Reilly (University of Auckland), Des Robbie (University of Melbourne)

View Abstracts
Conference Homepage

The pseudocomplement in pointfree topology.
by
Anneliese Schauerte
University of Cape Town

Frame (or locale) theory is a way of approaching topological spaces that makes the collection of open sets the basic notion under consideration; the underlying set is of lesser importance. Since finite intersections and arbitrary unions of open sets are open, the open sets of a topological space form a complete lattice, in which finite intersections distribute over arbitrary unions. Such a lattice is called a frame. This simple change of viewpoint has many interesting consequences. It is well known that the Tychonoff Product Theorem (``any product of compact spaces is compact") is equivalent to the Axiom of Choice. Not so in frame theory - the corresponding result is true without any choice assumptions. Often, when frames and spaces differ, the situation in the former is better - for example, coproducts of regular frames preserve the Lindelof property; product of regular spaces do not. These ideas can also be approached from a different direction, beginning with uniform structures. Any uniform space has a natural topology underlying it; any quasi-uniform space (drop the symmetry axiom) has two natural underlying topologies. These bitopological spaces have their frame counterparts also; they are called biframes, and will be the particular topic of this talk. The pseudocomplement is a useful tool (arising in notions like regularity, booleanness and rimcompactness), which illustrates the similarities and the differences between frames and biframes.

Date received: May 23, 2002


Copyright © 2002 by the author(s). The author(s) of this document and the organizers of the conference have granted their consent to include this abstract in Atlas Mathematical Conference Abstracts. Document # cait-21.