Atlas Mathematical Conference Abstracts || Conferences | Abstracts | for Organizers | About AMCA

Arrangements in Boston: A Conference in Hyperplane Arrangements
June 12-15, 1999
Northeastern University
Boston, MA, USA

Organizers
Dan Cohen, David Massey, Alex Suciu

View Abstracts
Conference Homepage

Hyperplanes Arrangements and Graph Orientations
by
Daniel Slilaty
Binghamton University

Let G be a graph on vertices x1, ... , xn. For each edge (xi, xj) in G, the linear equation xi=xj defines a hyperplane in Rn. Call the arrangement of these hyperplanes HG. It is known that the regions defined by HG are in one-to-one correspndence with acycylic orientations of G. (An orientation of G is an assignment of directional arrows to the edges of G. It is acyclic if no circle (i.e. circuit) in G has cohernt directional arrows.) This provides a nice graph-theoretical description of the regions of an arrangement of hyperplanes. It is also known that this graph-theoretical description is sufficient to represent all orientations of the matroid associated with HG.

Consider a graph G along with a labeling f of the directed edges of G with nonzero real numbers in which f(xi, xj)=1/f(xj, xi). For each edge (xi, xj) in G, the linear equation xi=f(xi, xj)xj defines a hyperplane in Rn, call the arrangement of these hyperplanes HG, f. We will give a graph-theoretical description of the regions defined by HG, f. We will also show that this graph-theoretical description, in a number of cases but not in general, suffices to describe all orientations of the matroid associated with HG, f.

Date received: May 31, 1999


Copyright © 1999 by the author(s). The author(s) of this document and the organizers of the conference have granted their consent to include this abstract in Atlas Mathematical Conference Abstracts. Document # cadi-16.