Every subspace of the real line
with the Euclidean
metric d has the following two properties:
(a) There exist no four distinct points
and
such that
for each i = 1, 2;
(b) There exist no four distinct points
and
such that
.
The first purpose of this note is to prove conversely the
following theorem:
The second purpose is to show that a separable metric space
(X, d) having (a) alone need not be homeomorphic to a
subspace of
.
Since the circle with a metric inherited from the Euclidean
metric d on the plane has (b), a metric space (X, d)
having (b) alone need not be homeomorphic to a subspace of
.
In the remaining part of this section, we discuss the
relationship between the property (a) and other metric
properties.
Recall from [1] that a metric space (X, d) has the
unique midset property (abbreviated UMP) if for every
pair of distinct points x and y, there exists one and
only one point p such that d(x, p) = d(y, p).
A metric space (X, d) having UMP has (a) and the converse
holds if (X, d) is connected (cf. [7], Lemma 2.1).
Berard [1] showed that a connected metric space consisting
of more than one point and having UMP is homeomorphic to an
interval in
.
Nadler [7] showed that a locally compact and separable
metric space having UMP is homeomorphic to a subspace of
.
However, UMP is too restrictive to describe a subspace of
, because not all subspaces X of
have a
compatible metric d for which (X, d) has UMP
(see Remarks 2).
The following theorem can be proved by the same way as the
proof of Nadler's theorem stated above.
An alternative proof of Theorem 2 will be given later.
Two subsets A and B of a metric space (X, d) are said
to be congruent if there exists a bijection
such that d(x, y) = d(f(x), f(y))
whenever x and y in A.
We say that a metric space has the unique triangle
property (abbreviated UTP) if no distinct subsets of
cardinality 3 are congruent.
Janos [4] proved that the dimension of a locally compact
and separable metric space having UTP is at most 1.
A metric space (X, d) having UTP has the property (a),
because if
for each i = 1, 2,
then the sets
and
are
congruent.
Hence, Theorem 2 sharpens Janos's theorem.
For further background, the reader is referred to [3]
and [5].
For a point p of a metric space (X, d) and
,
we write
and
.
Moreover, we often write simply X to denote a metric space
(X, d) and
abbreviate ^^ closed-and-open' to ^^ clopen'.
The letter
denotes the set of positive integers.
Other terms and notation follow [2].